Thursday, February 28, 2013

SEQUESTER - FISCAL CLIFF...IT'S ALL THE SAME (ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED 11/30/12)

Economic policy is geared towards controlling inflation during strong periods and controlling unemployment during weak periods.

The current "mania" over the fiscal cliff is a equivalent to the "mania" that occurred during the housing crisis.

It became the common wisdom and popular delusion that the price of residential real estate would rise in a straight line forever.  Obviously this was a delusion.  The delusion became so strong that people were allowed to borrow from banks the delusional paper profits that existed on their homes.  There was no regard for whether the personal income of the borrowers was rising enough to ever pay back the exaggerated mortgages.

Somehow or other a delusion has been created that it's okay to cut back on government deficits even when there is significant slack in the economy, little or no inflation, and unemployment well above the reported figures.

Therefore the politicians risk accepting an obviously incorrect economic policy for the current environment.  They have convinced a significant percentage of the population that the deficit is bad, no matter what economic conditions call for.  This is the same as being convinced that the price of houses would rise rapidly forever.

The Republican line of focusing on the deficit is the wrong policy at the moment.  Borrowing against an inflated house, at the wrong time, is the same as focusing on the deficit control at the wrong time.

There is a second delusional element that has come into the mainstream at exactly the wrong time. This combines with delusion number one, deficit reduction 2013.  Attempting to raise taxes for anyone while the economy is in a marginal state, is incorrect economic policy, as bad or worse than the prior discussion on deficit control.

We now face a government, on both sides, that have dug themselves into policies that are similar to the loaning against hyper inflated houses with risks that are clearly unknown.  Federal taxes have to be  paid by everyone and the government has to lead the way dynamically to modernize this country.  

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

HOUSING BUBBLE VS. GOLD BUBBLE (ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 2010)

Two sides to gold - bullish and bearish - for those of us that still own gold it's important to be aware of both. You then stake the claim and hope you are right...

A friend of mine bought a home for $300,000 ten years ago. By 2007, the price of similar homes in their neighborhood had tripled in value.

During the period when the price of housing was rising so rapidly, banks were criticized for collecting deposits in one impoverished area of the country and lending it out in other more prosperous regions. The quality of the loans was not a factor, the equitable distribution of loans seemed more important. People all over the country were ecstatic over their increase of wealth through home ownership.

The government, in spite of everything, had created Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac and everything possible to increase home ownership. Practically no one was telling homeowners to liquidate their homes. Construction of homes was booming, millions of people were employed in the sector and no one dared to stop this lucrative bubble.

When the house I mentioned above was purchased in 1999, it would have taken approximately 1000 ounces of gold to pay for the home. Today, it would take only 250 ounces of gold to buy the same $300,000 house. Housing prices have “crashed” and gold has soared. In effect, gold has gone from $350 per ounce in 1999 to $1300 per ounce today.

Gold is basically a useless commodity. The price is a “bubble” that may sustain itself forever and ever, but it is a bubble. You can’t eat gold, it’s hard to carry, it earns you no money and its industrial uses are limited. Again, no one dares to tell people to sell their gold even though you can now buy it in vending machines. No one would even think of telling the mining industry to stop the production of gold, for fear of destroying yet another industry that is the primary source of employment and revenues in many struggling countries. I think we are all aware of the macro reasons that are being suggested to support current gold prices.

Keynes said that in the end investing is nothing more than a game of musical chairs and that when the music stops; we don’t want to be the ones without a chair. We still own gold. The late removal of hedges should finally allow the gold mining companies to achieve significant earnings increases. When interest rates normalize, gold prices will fall substantially. In the meantime, the music continues to play...Stay tuned.

Friday, February 8, 2013

DELL...A CARD FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE DECK?

In my 55 years in the investment business I would be hard pressed find a bigger boondoggle than the Dell situation.  Dell should be capable of paying shareholders a $5 dividend from their excess cash and earning power.  That action would probably reduce the price of Dell's stock to about $8 a share.

The $8 a share stock would be earning somewhere around $1.30 to $1.60 a share. This would enable them to pay as much .70 or .80 cents a share annual dividend, yielding close to 10%.

Whatever savings Mr. Dell plans to make after the company is private would be welcomed by shareholders while it is public and should add further to earnings.

The idea that those actions can't be taken because Dell is a  public company borders on the absurd, and seems to be an attempt to confuse smaller shareholders.

Obviously there are risks in the fundamentals of the PC industry, but do not deceive yourself.  It is totally illogical to think that Mr. Dell would put his shares into the new company plus almost 1 billion dollars on top of the leverage created, if he didn't expect a hefty return.

Give us a break Mr. Dell...investors aren't that stupid.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

US GOVERNMENT VS. STANDARD AND POORS...

The implications of the government lawsuit against Standard and Poors will have ramifications far beyond the simple claims which are being made.  Over time, this case will rock the Democratic party to its core and bring the entire process of government under a black dark cloud.  Stay tuned...

Monday, February 4, 2013

PAY BACK TIME FOR THE STANDARD AND POORS RATING AGENCY...(ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED JUNE 2012)

There can be no doubt that Franklin Roosevelt was an immensely impressive human being.  His ability to bring an extremely divided nation through the depression years and through a devastating World War II is beyond the conceptual powers of most of us mortals.  He was a great man whether you believed in some of his policies or not. 
Many of his economic views were concerned with what human beings were "entitled" to.  Entitlement had to be paid for.  An elaborate system of taxation on almost every level of society was put into place.  Medicare tax, Medicaid tax, Social Security Tax, Property Tax...TAX,TAX, TAX.

Along the way a lot of little things happened.  One of those little things was the government approving three bond rating services, Standard and Poors, Moodys and Fitch.

Here is the point.  Over the years, common sense would tell you that the agencies saw the eroding financial stability of many states, cities, etc.  It became absolutely impossible for the agencies to lower the ratings.  It was tacitly understood that the taxing power of municipalities would cover the revenue needs of these entities.  It didn't matter if the quality of the revenue streams were eroding and that the demands of labor, supported by liberal politicians, was raising costs as the ability to tax was diminishing. 

The agencies had to know that if they lowered ratings, in accordance with the financial flows of the municipal agencies, the interest cost of raising money would have been higher and higher.  So the concept was created that it didn't matter if the financial stability of municipalities was eroding because in the end, the federal government would bail out the municipalities.  Therefore, why lower the municipality ratings as they were as good as the federal government was conceptually.  Arguably, even though municipalities were separate from the federal government for financing, that was really a mirage.  The rating agencies understood it, the municipalities understood it, and the federal government understood it.  Above all else, labor unions understood it so why not just unionize the government workforce and in the end the federal government will be responsible.

Along comes the housing crises of 2008 and the federal government starts to look for scape goats and finds that the rating agencies seem to have overrated lots of municipal securities. 

Okay, so then some congressional committee starts to investigate the rating agencies for incompetence. This looks good to the public and guess what...the rating agencies say "Wait a minute...they are blaming us for helping them keep their interest costs down.  We just did what they wanted us to do." Okay what to do.  Guess what. The rating agencies decide to go honest. They reduce the credit rating of the federal government for the first time ever.  In effect they were saying as in a famous Jack Nicholson movie, "You don't want to hear the truth. You can't take it." 

The only saving grace is that as things stands today, the federal government can print money forever.  Consequently, it can pay its bills in dollars that are worth something, be they municipal or federal obligations. 

People in the government are always changing, no one has to take responsibility,  and they can take all their time blaming everyone else when something goes wrong.

There is no doubt Roosevelt was a great man.  But to this day the crash of colliding viewpoints hasn't figured out how to truly raise the standard of living.

More on this subject will follow...

Friday, February 1, 2013

OPPORTUNITY- YES EASY- NO (ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER 2010)

Most professional investors use pretty much the same approach to investing assets. They try to ignore the trend of the market, don’t waste their time on economic forecasts and overweight a sector, industry or company plus or minus a few percentage points.
It’s been well shown by the performance of index funds that outperforming the markets, year in and year out, is one heck of a difficult task.

Without going into detail, I’ll summarize the market in one quick sentence. There is ample opportunity to win if you are either smart or lucky. The key word is opportunity.

Over the years I have successfully invested my own money by buying securities, both for trading and investing. I’m happy to share with you, for whatever it’s worth, some of my more rudimentary thoughts about making money.

1. KNOW YOUR RISK LEVEL

2. KNOW IF IT’S JUST A GAMBLE

3. NOT BELIEVING THE TREND OF CURRENT EARNINGS PER SHARE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN VALUE

4. NOT BEING ABLE TO COMPARE FEELINGS OF VALUE VS. FEELINGS OF THE CHART

5. POSITIONS CAN BE SMALL

6. BUILD ON SUCCESS

7. ONLY DO WHAT YOU THINK IS RIGHT

8. NOT ACTING ON A THOUGHT WHEN YOU HAVE IT

9. LACK OF PATIENCE

10. NOT WAITING FOR A THOUGHT TO COME

11. ACT ON FEELINGS WHEN YOU GET THEM

12. KNOW WHY YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING

13. GAMBLE A BIT MORE

14. LOOK AT ALL DIFFERENT CHARTS

15. CORRECT MISTAKES – RIGHT OR WRONG

16. WORK A LITTLE HARDER ON THE FACTS

17. YOU MUST ACT IN ORDER TO SUCCEED

18. IF YOU CAN, RATE YOUR FEELINGS – WEAK, MEDIUM, STRONG

19. IF THINGS DON’T GO WELL, WRITE DOWN WHY NOT

20. VALUE IS NOT THE STORY, TREND AND DIRECTION OF EARNINGS IS


21. WHEN THE CHARTS SEEM TO READ A DIFFERENT STORY FOLLOW THE ONE WHICH IS MOST LONG TERM
22. YOU DON’T HAVE TO SELL THE WHOLE POSITION

23. SMALL GAINS DON’T MAKE YOU RICH


24. WHEN YOU MAKE A LOT OF MONEY TOO FAST, TAKE PROFITS

25. WHEN A COMPANY MAKES THEIR NUMBERS AND ACHIEVES THEIR GOALS YOU REWARD THEM BY STAYING BY THEIR SIDE, WHEN THEY FAIL YOU LESSEN POSITION

26. TRIPLING YOUR MONEY MEANS NOTHING IF IT'S ONLY SMALL PERCENTAGE OF YOUR ASSETS
27. ONLY TOTAL RETURN COUNTS

 

Shepard Osherow. All Rights Reserved